Summary judgment ka concept simple hai: jab dispute me real factual controversy hi nahi bachi, to full trial karne ka koi sense nahi. Court seedha documents, pleadings, affidavits dekh ke decide kar sakti hai ki kis side ko decree milni chahiye.
Iska fayda time aur cost dono bachana hai. Example: aapka written loan agreement hai, borrower admit karta hai ki paisa liya tha, sirf chhote technical bahane bana raha hai. Aise case me “issues frame karo, gawah bulao, cross-examination karo” wala drama unnecessary ho sakta hai.
Judge yeh evaluate karta hai ki kya defence bona fide hai ya sirf delay strategy. Agar defendant sirf vague denial kare, koi solid document ya alternative story na de, to summary judgment mil sakta hai.
Plaintiff ke liye important hai ki claim clean ho – clear documents, calculation table, and proper pleadings. Agar case complex evidence pe depend kare – oral agreements, multiple transactions, intention prove karna, etc. – to phir trial avoid karna mushkil hai.
Summary judgment system tab best kaam karta hai jab lawyers honestly matter ko “trial-worthy” ya “paper-based” category me divide karein, sirf adjournment culture follow na karein.
